Bibliography

Harvest technology (r)evolutions

Keywords: absorptive capacity, biomimicry, cross-industry innovation, Delphi method, greensourcing, not-invented-here, reverse engineering, technology intelligence

• (Book) Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1978). Organizational Learning, Readings. MA: Addison.
• (Video) How does nature do life-friendly chemistry? – AskNature Nugget by Biomimicry Institute (on Vimeo)
• (Article) Almeida, P., Dokko, G., & Rosenkopf, L. (2003). Startup size and the mechanisms of external learning: increasing opportunity and decreasing ability?. Research Policy, 32(2), 301-315.
• (Article) Amara, N., & Landry, R. (2005). Sources of information as determinants of novelty of innovation in manufacturing firms: evidence from the 1999 statistics Canada innovation survey. Technovation, 25(3), 245-259.
• (Article) Antons, D., & Piller, F.T. (2015). Opening the black box of “Not Invented Here”: attitudes, decision biases, and behavioral consequences. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 29(2), 193-217.
• (Article) Becker, W., & Dietz, J. (2004). R&D cooperation and innovation activities of firms—evidence for the German manufacturing industry. Research Policy, 33(2), 209-223..
• (Article) Bercovitz, J. E., & Feldman, M. P. (2007). Fishing upstream: Firm innovation strategy and university research alliances. Research Policy, 36(7), 930-948.
• (Article) Bierly III, P. E., Damanpour, F., & Santoro, M. D. (2009). The application of external knowledge: organizational conditions for exploration and exploitation. Journal of Management Studies, 46(3), 481-509.
• (Article) Bouty, I. (2000). Interpersonal and interaction influences on informal resource exchanges between R&D researchers across organizational boundaries. Academy of Management Journal, 43(1), 50-65.
• (Article) Breschi, S., & Catalini, C. (2010). Tracing the links between science and technology: An exploratory analysis of scientists’ and inventors’ networks. Research Policy, 39(1), 14-26.
• (Article) Brusoni, S., Prencipe, A., & Pavitt, K. (2001). Knowledge specialization, organizational coupling, and the boundaries of the firm: why do firms know more than they make?. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(4), 597-621.
• (Article) Chen, C. J. (2004). The effects of knowledge attribute, alliance characteristics, and absorptive capacity on knowledge transfer performance. R&D Management, 34(3), 311-321.
• (Article) Chiesa, V., Manzini, R., & Pizzurno, E. (2004). The externalisation of R&D activities and the growing market of product development services. R&d Management, 34(1), 65-75.
• (Article) Chiu, I., & Shu, L. H. (2006). Biomimetic design through natural language analysis to facilitate cross-domain information retrieval. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 21, 45-59
• (Article) Cohen, W.M. and Levinthal, D.A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, March 1990, 128-152
• (Article) Csete, M. E., & Doyle, J. C. (2002). Reverse engineering of biological complexity. Science, 295(5560), 1664-1669.
• (Article) Day, G. S., & Schoemaker, P. J. (2000). Avoiding the pitfalls of emerging technologies. California Management Review, 42(2), 8-33.
• (Article) De Marchi, V. (2012). Environmental innovation and R&D cooperation: Empirical evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms. Research Policy, 41(3), 614-623.
• (Article) Denicolai, S., Ramirez, M., & Tidd, J. (2014). Creating and capturing value from external knowledge: the moderating role of knowledge intensity. R&D Management, 44(3), 248-264.
• (Article) Denicolai, S., Ramirez, M., & Tidd, J. (2016). Overcoming the false dichotomy between internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition: Absorptive capacity dynamics over time. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 104, 57-65.
• (Article) Díaz-Díaz, N. L., & de Saá Pérez, P. (2014). The interaction between external and internal knowledge sources: an open innovation view. Journal of Knowledge Management, 18(2), 430-446.
• (Article) Eggers, J. P. (2012). Falling flat: Failed technologies and investment under uncertainty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 57(1), 47-80.
• (Article) Enkel, E., & Gassmann, O. (2010). Creative imitation: exploring the case of cross‐industry innovation. R&D Management, 40(3), 256-270.
• (Article) Enkel, E., & Heil, S. (2014). Preparing for distant collaboration: Antecedents to potential absorptive capacity in cross-industry innovation. Technovation, 34(4), 242-260.
• (Article) Escribano, A., Fosfuri, A., & Tribó, J. A. (2009). Managing external knowledge flows: The moderating role of absorptive capacity. Research Policy, 38(1), 96-105.
• (Article) Fabrizio, K. R. (2009). Absorptive capacity and the search for innovation. Research Policy, 38(2), 255-267.
• (Article) Fleming, L., & Sorenson, O. (2004). Science as a map in technological search. Strategic Management Journal, 25(8‐9), 909-928.
• (Article) Foster, J. G., Rzhetsky, A., & Evans, J. A. (2015). Tradition and innovation in scientists’ research strategies. American Sociological Review, 80(5), 875-908.
• (Article) Franzoni, C., & Sauermann, H. (2014). Crowd science: The organization of scientific research in open collaborative projects. Research Policy, 43(1), 1-20.
• (Article) Garriga, H., Von Krogh, G., & Spaeth, S. (2013). How constraints and knowledge impact open innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 34(9), 1134-1144.
• (Article) Gassmann, O., Zeschky, M., Wolff, T., & Stahl, M. (2010). Crossing the industry-line: breakthrough innovation through cross-industry alliances with ‘non-suppliers’. Long Range Planning, 43(5-6), 639-654.
• (Article) Genus, A., & Coles, A. M. (2008). Rethinking the multi-level perspective of technological transitions. Research Policy, 37(9), 1436-1445.
• (Article) Goedhuys, M., & Veugelers, R. (2012). Innovation strategies, process and product innovations and growth: Firm-level evidence from Brazil. Structural change and economic dynamics, 23(4), 516-529.
• (Article) Grigoriou, K., & Rothaermel, F. T. (2017). Organizing for knowledge generation: internal knowledge networks and the contingent effect of external knowledge sourcing. Strategic Management Journal, 38(2), 395-414.
• (Article) Grimpe, C., & Kaiser, U. (2010). Balancing internal and external knowledge acquisition: the gains and pains from R&D outsourcing. Journal of Management Studies, 47(8), 1483-1509.
• (Article) Gupta, U. G., & Clarke, R. E. (1996). Theory and applications of the Delphi technique: A bibliography (1975–1994). Technological forecasting and social change, 53(2), 185-211.
• (Article) Hagedoorn, J., & Duysters, G. (2002). External sources of innovative capabilities: the preferences for strategic alliances or mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Management Studies, 39(2), 167-188.
• (Article) Herstad, S., Sandven, T., & Ebersberger, B. (2015). Recruitment, knowledge integration and modes of innovation. Research Policy, 44, 138-153.
• (Article) Hoang, H. A., & Rothaermel, F. T. (2010). Leveraging internal and external experience: exploration, exploitation, and R&D project performance. Strategic Management Journal, 31(7), 734-758.
• (Article) Holbrook, D., Cohen, W. M., Hounshell, D. A., & Klepper, S. (2000). The nature, sources, and consequences of firm differences in the early history of the semiconductor industry. Strategic Management Journal, 21(10‐11), 1017-1041.
• (Article) Hung, K. P., & Chou, C. (2013). The impact of open innovation on firm performance: The moderating effects of internal R&D and environmental turbulence. Technovation, 33(10-11), 368-380.
• (Article) Jansen, J. J., Van Den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (2005). Managing potential and realized absorptive capacity: how do organizational antecedents matter?. Academy of Management Journal, 48(6), 999-1015.
• (Article) Kalogerakis, K., Lüthje, C., & Herstatt, C. (2010). Developing innovations based on analogies: experience from design and engineering consultants. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(3), 418-436.
• (Article) Kaplan, S., & Tripsas, M. (2008). Thinking about technology: Applying a cognitive lens to technical change. Research Policy, 37(5), 790-805.
• (Article) Katz, R., & Allen, T. J. (1982). Investigating the Not Invented Here (NIH) syndrome: A look at the performance, tenure, and communication patterns of 50 R & D Project Groups. R&D Management, 12(1), 7-20
• (Article) Kaufman, A., Wood, C. H., & Theyel, G. (2000). Collaboration and technology linkages: a strategic supplier typology. Strategic Management Journal, 21(6), 649-663.
• (Article) Knoppen, D., Sáenz, M. J., & Johnston, D. A. (2011). Innovations in a relational context: Mechanisms to connect learning processes of absorptive capacity. Management Learning, 42(4), 419-438.
• (Article) Landeta, J. (2006). Current validity of the Delphi method in social sciences. Technological forecasting and social change, 73(5), 467-482.
• (Article) Lane, P. J., & Lubatkin, M. (1998). Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management Journal, 19(5), 461-477.
• (Article) Lane, P. J., Koka, B. R., & Pathak, S. (2006). The reification of absorptive capacity: A critical review and rejuvenation of the construct. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 833-863
• (Article) Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 131-150.
• (Article) Leischnig, A., Geigenmueller, A., & Lohmann, S. (2014). On the role of alliance management capability, organizational compatibility, and interaction quality in interorganizational technology transfer. Journal of Business Research, 67(6), 1049-1057.
• (Article) Leone, M. I., & Reichstein, T. (2012). Licensing‐in fosters rapid invention! The effect of the grant‐back clause and technological unfamiliarity. Strategic Management Journal, 33(8), 965-985.
• (Article) Lewin, A. Y., Massini, S., & Peeters, C. (2011). Microfoundations of internal and external absorptive capacity routines. Organization Science, 22(1), 81-98.
• (Article) Lifshitz-Assaf, H. (2017). Dismantling Knowledge Boundaries at NASA: The Critical Role of Professional Identity in Open Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 0001839217747876.
• (Article) Lin, B. W. (2003). Technology transfer as technological learning: a source of competitive advantage for firms with limited R&D resources. R&D Management, 33(3), 327-341.
• (Article) Malerba, F., & Orsenigo, L. (1996). Schumpeterian patterns of innovation are technology-specific. Research Policy, 25(3), 451-478.
• (Article) Mindruta, D. (2013). Value creation in university‐firm research collaborations: A matching approach. Strategic Management Journal, 34(6), 644-665.
• (Article) Monteiro, F., Mol, M., & Birkinshaw, J. (2017). Ready to be open? Explaining the firm level barriers to benefiting from openness to external knowledge. Long Range Planning, 50(2), 282-295.
• (Article) Mora-Valentin, E. M., Montoro-Sanchez, A., & Guerras-Martin, L. A. (2004). Determining factors in the success of R&D cooperative agreements between firms and research organizations. Research Policy, 33(1), 17-40.
• (Article) Nason, R. S., Wiklund, J., McKelvie, A., Hitt, M., & Yu, W. (2018). Orchestrating boundaries: The effect of R&D boundary permeability on new venture growth. Journal of Business Venturing. 34(1), 63-79
• (Article) Nicholls‐Nixon, C. L., & Woo, C. Y. (2003). Technology sourcing and output of established firms in a regime of encompassing technological change. Strategic Management Journal, 24(7), 651-666.
• (Article) Nobelius, D. (2004). Towards the sixth generation of R&D management. International Journal of Project Management, 22(5), 369-375.
• (Article) Noseleit, F., & de Faria, P. (2013). Complementarities of internal R&D and alliances with different partner types. Journal of Business Research, 66 (10), 2000-2006.
• (Article) Peeters, H., Callaert, J., & Van Looy, B. (2018). Do firms profit from involving academics when developing technology?. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 1-28.
• (Article) Ranft, A. L., & Lord, M. D. (2002). Acquiring new technologies and capabilities: A grounded model of acquisition implementation. Organization Science, 13(4), 420-441.
• (Article) Reichstein, T., & Salter, A. (2006). Investigating the sources of process innovation among UK manufacturing firms. Industrial and Corporate Change, 15 (4), 653-682.
• (Article) Ritter, T., & Gemünden, H. G. (2004). The impact of a company’s business strategy on its technological competence, network competence and innovation success. Journal of Business Research, 57(5), 548-556.
• (Article) Salter, A., Ter Wal, A. L., Criscuolo, P., & Alexy, O. (2015). Open for ideation: Individual‐level openness and idea generation in R&D. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(4), 488-504.
• (Article) Schiele, H. (2012). Accessing supplier innovation by being their preferred customer. Research-Technology Management, 55(1), 44-50.
• (Article) Schildt, H., Keil, T., & Maula, M. (2012). The temporal effects of relative and firm‐level absorptive capacity on interorganizational learning. Strategic Management Journal, 33(10), 1154-1173
• (Article) Segarra-Blasco, A., & Arauzo-Carod, J. M. (2008). Sources of innovation and industry–university interaction: Evidence from Spanish firms. Research Policy, 37(8), 1283-1295.
• (Article) Shane, S. (2001). Technology regimes and new firm formation. Management Science, 47(9), 1173-1190.
• (Article) Shibata, N., Kajikawa, Y., Takeda, Y., & Matsushima, K. (2008). Detecting emerging research fronts based on topological measures in citation networks of scientific publications. Technovation, 28(11), 758-775.
• (Article) Sood, A., James, G. M., Tellis, G. J., & Zhu, J. (2012). Predicting the path of technological innovation: SAW vs. Moore, Bass, Gompertz, and Kryder. Marketing Science, 31(6), 964-979.
• (Article) Souitaris, V. (2002). Technological trajectories as moderators of firm-level determinants of innovation. Research Policy, 31(6), 877-898.
• (Article) Spencer, J. W. (2003). Firms’ knowledge‐sharing strategies in the global innovation system: empirical evidence from the flat panel display industry. Strategic management journal, 24(3), 217-233.
• (Article) Spithoven, A., Clarysse, B., & Knockaert, M. (2010). Building absorptive capacity to organise inbound open innovation in traditional industries. Technovation, 30(2), 130-141.
• (Article) Stock, G. N., Greis, N. P., & Fischer, W. A. (2001). Absorptive capacity and new product development. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 12(1), 77-91.
• (Article) Tether, B. S., & Tajar, A. (2008). Beyond industry–university links: Sourcing knowledge for innovation from consultants, private research organisations and the public science-base. Research Policy, 37(6-7), 1079-1095.
• (Article) Tidd, J., & Trewhella, M. J. (1997). Organizational and technological antecedents for knowledge acquisition and learning. R&D Management, 27(4), 359-375.
• (Article) Todorova, G., & Durisin, B. (2007). Absorptive capacity: Valuing a reconceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 774-786.
• (Article) Tsai, K. H., & Wang, J. C. (2009). External technology sourcing and innovation performance in LMT sectors: An analysis based on the Taiwanese Technological Innovation Survey. Research Policy, 38(3), 518-526.
• (Article) Un, C. A., & Rodríguez, A. (2018). Learning from R&D outsourcing vs. learning by R&D outsourcing. Technovation, 72, 24-33.
• (Article) Van de Poel, I. (2003). The transformation of technological regimes. Research Policy, 32(1), 49-68.
• (Article) Van de Vrande, V. (2013). Balancing your technology‐sourcing portfolio: How sourcing mode diversity enhances innovative performance. Strategic Management Journal, 34(5), 610-621.
• (Article) Vanhaverbeke, W., Duysters, G., & Noorderhaven, N. (2002). External technology sourcing through alliances or acquisitions: An analysis of the application-specific integrated circuits industry. Organization Science, 13(6), 714-733.
• (Article) Vasudeva, G., & Anand, J. (2011). Unpacking absorptive capacity: A study of knowledge utilization from alliance portfolios. Academy of Management Journal, 54(3), 611-623.
• (Article) Viotti, E. B. (2002). National learning systems: a new approach on technological change in late industrializing economies and evidences from the cases of Brazil and South Korea. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 69(7), 653-680.
• (Article) Volberda, H. W., Foss, N. J., & Lyles, M. A. (2010). Perspective—Absorbing the concept of absorptive capacity: How to realize its potential in the organization field. Organization Science, 21(4), 931-951.
• (Article) Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185-203.
• (Article) Zobel, A.K. (2017). Benefiting from open innovation: A multidimensional model of absorptive capacity. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 34(3), 269-288.

Explore untapped customer needs: user-centric innovation

Keywords: cocreation, customer analytics, ethnography, lead users, living labs, market research, quality function deployment, toolkits, untapped customer needs, user-centric innovations, value gaps

• (Book) Christensen, C., Karen Dillon, Taddy Hall, & Duncan, D.S. (2016) Competing Against Luck: The Story of Innovation and Customer Choice, Harper Business.
• (Book) Living Labs: Best of TIM Review; Dec 18, 2015 by Mika Westerlund and Seppo Leminen
• (Book) Management of the Fuzzy Front End of Innovation; Oct 8, 2013 by Oliver Gassmann and Fiona Schweitzer
• (Book) Thallmaier, S. R. (2014). Customer co-design: A study in the mass customization industry. Springer.
• (Video) http://livinglab.mit.edu/
• (Video) How Qualitative Research Shapes the Innovation Process by Kuczmarski Innovation (on Vimeo)
• (Article) Antorini, Y.M., Muñiz Jr, A.M., & Askildsen, T. (2012). Collaborating with customer communities: Lessons from the Lego group. MIT Sloan Management Review, 53(3), 73-79.
• (Article) Bala I., M. Subramaniam, & Srinivasa Rangan, U. (2017). The Next Battle in Antitrust Will Be About Whether One Company Knows Everything About You. Harvard Business Review, July 06, 2017.
• (Article) Baldwin, C., Hienerth, C., & Von Hippel, E. (2006). How user innovations become commercial products: A theoretical investigation and case study. Research Policy, 35(9), 1291-1313.
• (Article) Belz, F. M., & Baumbach, W. (2010). Netnography as a method of lead user identification. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(3), 304-313.
• (Article) Bettencourt, L.A., & Ulwick, A.W. (2008). The customer-centered innovation map. Harvard Business Review, 86(5), 109.
• (Article) Bogers, M., Afuah, A., & Bastian, B. (2010). Users as innovators: a review, critique, and future research directions. Journal of Management, 36(4), 857-875.
• (Article) Bohlmann, Jonathan D., et al. “The interplay of customer and product innovation dynamics: an exploratory study.” Journal of Product Innovation Management 30.2 (2013): 228-244.
• (Article) Callahan, J., & Lasry, E. (2004). The importance of customer input in the development of very new products. R&D Management, 34(2), 107-120.
• (Article) Coviello, N. E., & Joseph, R. M. (2012). Creating major innovations with customers: Insights from small and young technology firms. Journal of Marketing, 76(6), 87-104
• (Article) Day, G. S. (1994). The capabilities of market-driven organizations. the Journal of Marketing, 37-52.
• (Article) Dell’Era, C., & Landoni, P. (2014). Living Lab: A methodology between user‐centred design and participatory design. Creativity and Innovation Management, 23(2), 137-154.
• (Article) Edvardsson, B., Kristensson, P., Magnusson, P., & Sundström, E. (2012). Customer integration within service development—A review of methods and an analysis of insitu and exsitu contributions. Technovation, 32(7-8), 419-429.
• (Article) Enkel, E., Perez‐Freije, J., & Gassmann, O. (2005). Minimizing market risks through customer integration in new product development: learning from bad practice. Creativity and Innovation Management, 14(4), 425-437.
• (Article) Etgar, M. (2008). A descriptive model of the consumer co-production process. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 97-108.
• (Article) Fang, E. (2008). Customer participation and the trade-off between new product innovativeness and speed to market. Journal of Marketing, 72(4), 90-104.
• (Article) Foss, N. J., Laursen, K., & Pedersen, T. (2011). Linking customer interaction and innovation: The mediating role of new organizational practices. Organization Science, 22(4), 980-999.
• (Article) Franke, N., & Shah, S. (2003). How communities support innovative activities: an exploration of assistance and sharing among end-users. Research Policy, 32(1), 157-178.
• (Artilce) Franke, N., & Piller, F. (2004). Value creation by toolkits for user innovation and design: The case of the watch market. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21(6), 401-415.
• (Article) Franke, N., Von Hippel, E., & Schreier, M. (2006). Finding commercially attractive user innovations: A test of lead‐user theory. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(4), 301-315.
• (Article) Franke, N., & Hader, C. (2014). Mass or only “niche customization”? Why we should interpret configuration toolkits as learning instruments. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(6), 1214-1234.
• (Article) Fuchs, C., & Schreier, M. (2011). Customer empowerment in new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(1), 17-32.
• (Article) Gassmann, O., Kausch, C., & Enkel, E. (2010). Negative side effects of customer integration. International Journal of Technology Management, 50(1), 43-62.
• (Article) Greer, C. R., & Lei, D. (2012). Collaborative innovation with customers: A review of the literature and suggestions for future research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 14(1), 63-84.
• (Article) Hang, C. C., Garnsey, E., & Ruan, Y. (2015). Opportunities for disruption. Technovation, 39, 83-93.
• (Article) Herstatt, C., & Von Hippel, E. (1992). From experience: Developing new product concepts via the lead user method: A case study in a “low-tech” field. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 9(3), 213-221.
• (Article) Hoholm, T., & Araujo, L. (2011). Studying innovation processes in real-time: The promises and challenges of ethnography. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(6), 933-939.
• (Article) Hopkins, M. M., Tidd, J., Nightingale, P., & Miller, R. (2011). Generative and degenerative interactions: positive and negative dynamics of open, user‐centric innovation in technology and engineering consultancies. R&D Management, 41(1), 44-60.
• (Article) Hoyer, W. D., Chandy, R., Dorotic, M., Krafft, M., & Singh, S. S. (2010). Consumer cocreation in new product development. Journal of Service Research, 13(3), 283-296.
• (Article) Hudson, L. A., & Ozanne, J. L. (1988). Alternative ways of seeking knowledge in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(4), 508-521.
• (Article) Hyysalo, S. (2009). User innovation and everyday practices: micro‐innovation in sports industry development. R&D Management, 39(3), 247-258.
• (Article) Jeppesen, L. B., & Molin, M. J. (2003). Consumers as co-developers: Learning and innovation outside the firm. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 15(3), 363-383.
• (Article) Jeppesen, L.B., & Frederiksen, L. (2006). Why do users contribute to firm-hosted user communities? The case of computer-controlled music instruments, Organization Science, 17(1), 45-63
• (Article) Lettl, C., Herstatt, C., & Gemuenden, H. G. (2006). Users’ contributions to radical innovation: evidence from four cases in the field of medical equipment technology. R&D Management, 36(3), 251-272.
• (Article) Lilien, G. L., Morrison, P. D., Searls, K., Sonnack, M., & Hippel, E. V. (2002). Performance assessment of the lead user idea-generation process for new product development. Management Science, 48(8), 1042-1059.
• (Article) Lüthje, C. (2004). Characteristics of innovating users in a consumer goods field: An empirical study of sport-related product consumers. Technovation, 24(9), 683-695.
• (Article) Lüthje, C., & Herstatt, C. (2004). The Lead User method: an outline of empirical findings and issues for future research. R&D Management, 34(5), 553-568.
• (Article) Lüthje, C., Herstatt, C., & Von Hippel, E. (2005). User-innovators and “local” information: The case of mountain biking. Research Policy, 34(6), 951-965.
• (Article) Magnusson, P. R., Matthing, J., & Kristensson, P. (2003). Managing user involvement in service innovation: Experiments with innovating end users. Journal of Service Research, 6(2), 111-124.
• (Article) Magnusson, P. R. (2009). Exploring the contributions of involving ordinary users in ideation of technology‐based services. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(5), 578-593.
• (Article) Mahr, D., Lievens, A., & Blazevic, V. (2014). The value of customer cocreated knowledge during the innovation process. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(3), 599-615.
• (Article) Matzler, K., & Hinterhuber, H. H. (1998). How to make product development projects more successful by integrating Kano’s model of customer satisfaction into quality function deployment. Technovation, 18(1), 25-38.
• (Article) Morrison, P. D., Roberts, J. H., & Midgley, D. F. (2004). The nature of lead users and measurement of leading edge status. Research Policy, 33(2), 351-362.
• (Article) Morrison, P. D., Roberts, J. H., & Von Hippel, E. (2000). Determinants of user innovation and innovation sharing in a local market. Management Science, 46(12), 1513-1527
• (Article) Mukerjee, K. (2013). Customer-oriented organizations: a framework for innovation. Journal of Business Strategy, 34(3), 49-56.
• (Article) Norton, M. I., Mochon, D., & Ariely, D. (2012). The IKEA effect: When labor leads to love. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(3), 453-460.
• (Article) Paladino, A. (2007). Investigating the drivers of innovation and new product success: a comparison of strategic orientations. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 24(6), 534-553.
• (Article) Parmentier, G., & Mangematin, V. (2014). Orchestrating innovation with user communities in the creative industries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 83, 40-53.
• (Article) Piller, F. T., & Walcher, D. (2006). Toolkits for idea competitions: a novel method to integrate users in new product development. R&D Management, 36(3), 307-318.
• (Article) Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2000). Co-opting customer competence. Harvard Business Review, 78(1), 79-90.
• (Article) Raasch, C., Herstatt, C., & Balka, K. (2009). On the open design of tangible goods. R&D Management, 39(4), 382-393.
• (Article) Sandmeier, P., Morrison, P. D., & Gassmann, O. (2010). Integrating customers in product innovation: lessons from industrial development contractors and in‐house contractors in rapidly changing customer markets. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(2), 89-106.
• (Article) Sawhney, M., Verona, G., & Prandelli, E. (2005). Collaborating to create: The Internet as a platform for customer engagement in product innovation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 19(4), 4-17.
• (Article) Schreier, Martin, Stefan Oberhauser, and Reinhard Prügl. “Lead users and the adoption and diffusion of new products: Insights from two extreme sports communities.” Marketing Letters 18.1-2 (2007): 15-30.
• (Article) Schweisfurth, T., & Raasch, C. (2015). ‘Embedded lead users-The benefits of employing users from corporate innovation’. Research Policy, 44, 168-180.
• (Article) Slater, S. F., & Narver, J. C. (2000). Intelligence generation and superior customer value. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(1), 120.
• (Article) Urban, G. L., & Von Hippel, E. (1988). Lead user analyses for the development of new industrial products. Management Science, 34(5), 569-582.
• (Article) Verganti, R. (2008). Design, meanings, and radical innovation: A metamodel and a research agenda. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25(5), 436-456.
• (Article) Veryzer, R. W., & Borja de Mozota, B. (2005). The impact of user‐oriented design on new product development: An examination of fundamental relationships. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22(2), 128-143
• (Article) Von Hippel, E. (1986). Lead users: a source of novel product concepts. Management Science, 32(7), 791-805.
• (Article) Von Hippel, E. (2001). User toolkits for innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18(4), 247-257.
• (Article) Von Hippel, E., & Katz, R. (2002). Shifting innovation to users via toolkits. Management Science, 48(7), 821-833.
• (Article) Voorberg, W. H., Bekkers, V. J., & Tummers, L. G. (2015). A systematic review of co-creation and co-production: Embarking on the social innovation journey. Public Management Review, 17(9), 1333-1357.
• (Article) Wiertz, C., & de Ruyter, K. (2007). Beyond the call of duty: Why customers contribute to firm-hosted commercial online communities. Organization Studies, 28(3), 347-376.
• (Article) Xu, Z., Frankwick, G. L., & Ramirez, E. (2016). Effects of big data analytics and traditional marketing analytics on new product success: A knowledge fusion perspective. Journal of Business Research, 69(5), 1562-1566.
• (Article) Zhong, W., Ma, Z., Tong, T. W., Zhang, Y., & Xie, L. (2020). Customer Concentration, Executive Attention, and Firm Search Behavior. Academy of Management Journal, (ja).

Seeding new ventures: corporate venture capital

Keywords: acquisitions, corporate venture capital, objectives of corporate venture capital, hackatons, innovation contests, innovation prizes

• (Book) Landström, Hans, ed. Handbook of research on venture capital. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2007.
• (Book) Maula, Markku VJ. Corporate venture capital and the value-added for technology-based new firms. Helsinki University of Technology, 2001.
• (Video) Biopharma Health MIT Hackathon
• (Video) Connecting Companies of All Sizes through Innovation by  Kuczmarski Innovation (on Vimeo)
• (Video) The UBS Hackaton (on UBS website)
• (Article) Adamczyk, S., Bullinger, A. C., & Möslein, K. M. (2012). Innovation contests: A review, classification and outlook. Creativity and Innovation Management, 21(4), 335-360.
• (Article) Ahuja, G., & Katila, R. (2001). Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: A longitudinal study. Strategic Management Journal, 22(3), 197-220.
•  (Article) Alvarez‐Garrido, E., & Dushnitsky, G. (2016). Are entrepreneurial venture’s innovation rates sensitive to investor complementary assets? Comparing biotech ventures backed by corporate and independent VCs. Strategic Management Journal, 37(5), 819-834.
• (Article) Arora, A., & Gambardella, A. (2010). Ideas for rent: an overview of markets for technology. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(3), 775-803.
• (Article) Basu, S., Phelps, C., & Kotha, S. (2011). Towards understanding who makes corporate venture capital investments and why. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(2), 153-171.
• (Article) Becker, B., & Gassmann, O. (2006). Gaining leverage effects from knowledge modes within corporate incubators. R&D Management, 36(1), 1-16.
• (Article) Belderbos, R., Jacob, J., & Lokshin, B., (2018). Corporate venture capital (CVC) investments and technological performance: Geographic diversity and the interplay with technology alliances, Journal of Business Venturing, 33(1), 20-34.
• (Article) Benson, David, and Rosemarie H. Ziedonis. “Corporate venture capital as a window on new technologies: Implications for the performance of corporate investors when acquiring startups.” Organization Science 20.2 (2009): 329-351.
• (Article) Block, Zenas, and Oscar A. Ornati. “Compensating corporate venture managers.” Journal of Business Venturing 2.1 (1987): 41-51.
• (Article) Boudreau, K. J., Lacetera, N., & Lakhani, K. R. (2011). Incentives and problem uncertainty in innovation contests: An empirical analysis. Management Science, 57(5), 843-863.
• (Article) Bullinger, A. C., Neyer, A. K., Rass, M., & Moeslein, K. M. (2010). Community‐based innovation contests: Where competition meets cooperation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(3), 290-303.
• (Article) Chemmanur, T. J., Loutskina, E., & Tian, X. (2014). Corporate venture capital, value creation, and innovation. The Review of Financial Studies, 27(8), 2434-2473.
• (Article) Chesbrough, H. (2000). Designing corporate ventures in the shadow of private venture capital. California Management Review, 42(3), 31-49.
• (Article) Cloodt, M., Hagedoorn, J., & Van Kranenburg, H. (2006). Mergers and acquisitions: Their effect on the innovative performance of companies in high-tech industries. Research Policy, 35(5), 642-654.
• (Article) Colombo, M. G., & Shafi, K. (2016). Swimming with sharks in Europe: When are they dangerous and what can new ventures do to defend themselves?. Strategic Management Journal, 37(11), 2307-2322.
• (Article) Covin, J.G., & Miles, M.P. (2007). Strategic use of corporate venturing. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(2), 183-207.
• (Article) Dushnitsky, G., & Lenox, M.J. (2005). When do incumbents learn from entrepreneurial ventures?: Corporate venture capital and investing firm innovation rates. Research Policy, 34(5), 615-639.
• (Article) Dushnitsky, G., & Lenox, M. J. (2005). When do firms undertake R&D by investing in new ventures?. Strategic Management Journal, 26(10), 947-965.
• (Article) Dushnitsky, G., & Lenox, M.J. (2006). When does corporate venture capital investment create firm value?. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(6), 753-772.
• (Article) Dushnitsky, G., & Shapira, Z. (2010). Entrepreneurial finance meets organizational reality: Comparing investment practices and performance of corporate and independent venture capitalists. Strategic Management Journal, 31(9), 990-1017.
• (Article) Dushnitsky, G., & Shaver, J. M. (2009). Limitations to interorganizational knowledge acquisition: The paradox of corporate venture capital. Strategic Management Journal, 30(10), 1045-1064.
• (Article) Enkel, E., & Sagmeister, V. (2020). External corporate venturing modes as new way to develop dynamic capabilities. Technovation, 102128.
• (Article) Ernst, H., Witt, P., & Brachtendorf, G. (2005). Corporate venture capital as a strategy for external innovation: an exploratory empirical study. R&D Management, 35(3), 233-242.
• (Article) Füller, J., Hutter, K., & Faullant, R. (2011). Why co‐creation experience matters? Creative experience and its impact on the quantity and quality of creative contributions. R&D Management, 41(3), 259-273.
• (Article) Gaba, V., & Bhattacharya, S. (2012). Aspirations, innovation, and corporate venture capital: A behavioral perspective. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 6(2), 178-199.
• (Article) Gans, J. S., Hsu, D. H., & Stern, S. (2002). When does start-up innovation spur the gale of creative destruction?. RAND Journal of Economics, 33(4), 571-587.
• (Article) Gompers, Paul, and Josh Lerner. “Venture capital distributions: Short‐run and long‐run reactions.” The Journal of Finance 53.6 (1998): 2161-2183.
• (Article) Hellmann, T. (2002). A theory of strategic venture investing. Journal of Financial Economics, 64(2), 285-314.
• (Article) Hofstetter, R., Dahl, D. W., Aryobsei, S., & Herrmann, A. (2021). Constraining Ideas: How Seeing Ideas of Others Harms Creativity in Open Innovation. Journal of Marketing Research, 58(1), 95-114.
• (Article) Huang, P., & Madhavan, R. Dumb Money or Smart Money? Meta‐Analytically Unpacking Corporate Venture Capital. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal. doi:10.1002/sej.1369
• (Article) Hutter, K., Hautz, J., Füller, J., Mueller, J., & Matzler, K. (2011). Communitition: The tension between competition and collaboration in community‐based design contests. Creativity and Innovation Management, 20(1), 3-21.
• (Article) Ivanov, V. I., & Xie, F. (2010). Do corporate venture capitalists add value to start‐up firms? Evidence from IPOs and acquisitions of VC‐backed companies. Financial Management, 39(1), 129-152.
• (Article) Kapoor, R., & Lim, K. (2007). The impact of acquisitions on the productivity of inventors at semiconductor firms: A synthesis of knowledge-based and incentive-based perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 50(5), 1133-1155.
• (Article) Kay, L. (2011). The effect of inducement prizes on innovation: evidence from the Ansari XPrize and the Northrop Grumman Lunar Lander Challenge. R&D Management, 41(4), 360-377.
• (Article) Keil, T. (2004). Building external corporate venturing capability. Journal of Management Studies, 41(5), 799-825.
• (Article) Keil, T., Maula, M., Schildt, H., & Zahra, S. A. (2008). The effect of governance modes and relatedness of external business development activities on innovative performance. Strategic Management Journal, 29(8), 895-907.
• (Article) Knoben, J., & Bakker, R. M. (2019). The guppy and the whale: Relational pluralism and start-ups’ expropriation dilemma in partnership formation. Journal of Business Venturing 34(1), 103-121
• (Article) Lakhani, K. R., Boudreau, K. J., Loh, P. R., Backstrom, L., Baldwin, C., Lonstein, E., … & Guinan, E. C. (2013). Prize-based contests can provide solutions to computational biology problems. Nature Biotechnology, 31(2), 108.
• (Article) Lee, S. U., Park, G., & Kang, J. (2018). The double-edged effects of the corporate venture capital unit’s structural autonomy on corporate investors’ explorative and exploitative innovation. Journal of Business Research, 88, 141-149
• (Article) Maula, M., Autio, E., & Murray, G. (2003). Prerequisites for the creation of social capital and subsequent knowledge acquisition in corporate venture capital. Venture Capital: An International Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, 5(2), 117-134
• (Article) Maula, M., Autio, E., & Murray, G. (2005). Corporate venture capitalists and independent venture capitalists: What do they know, who do they know and should entrepreneurs care?. Venture Capital: An International Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, 7(1), 3-21.
• (Article) Maula, M. V., Keil, T., & Zahra, S.A. (2013). Top management’s attention to discontinuous technological change: Corporate venture capital as an alert mechanism. Organization Science, 24(3), 926-947.
• (Article) Miller, A., & Camp, B. (1985). Exploring determinants of success in corporate ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 1(1), 87-105.
• (Article) Minshall, T., Mortara, L., Valli, R., & Probert, D. (2010). Making “asymmetric” partnerships work. Research-Technology Management, 53(3), 53-63.
• (Article) Murray, F., Stern, S., Campbell, G., & MacCormack, A. (2012). Grand Innovation Prizes: A theoretical, normative, and empirical evaluation. Research Policy, 41(10), 1779-1792.
• (Article) PolidoroJr, F., & Yang, W. (2021). Corporate Investment Relationships and the Search for Innovations: An Examination of Startups’ Search Shift Toward Incumbents. Organization Science.
• (Article) Puranam, P., Singh, H., & Zollo, M. (2006). Organizing for innovation: Managing the coordination-autonomy dilemma in technology acquisitions. Academy of Management Journal, 49(2), 263-280.
• (Article) Puranam, P., & Srikanth, K. (2007). What they know vs. what they do: How acquirers leverage technology acquisitions. Strategic Management Journal, 28(8), 805-825.
• (Article) Rothaermel, F. T. (2001). Complementary assets, strategic alliances, and the incumbent’s advantage: an empirical study of industry and firm effects in the biopharmaceutical industry. Research Policy, 30(8), 1235-1251.
• (Article) Rothaermel, F. T. (2001). Incumbent’s advantage through exploiting complementary assets via interfirm cooperation. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6‐7), 687-699.
• (Article) Schildt, H. A., Maula, M. V., & Keil, T. (2005). Explorative and exploitative learning from external corporate ventures. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(4), 493-515.
• (Article) Shrader, R. C., & Simon, M. (1997). Corporate versus independent new ventures: Resource, strategy, and performance differences. Journal of Business Venturing, 12(1), 47-66.
• (Article) Souitaris, V., Zerbinati, S., & Liu, G. (2012). Which iron cage? Endo-and exoisomorphism in corporate venture capital programs. Academy of Management Journal, 55(2), 477-505.
• (Article) Souitaris, V., & Zerbinati, S. (2014). How do corporate venture capitalists do deals? An exploration of corporate investment practices. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 8(4), 321-348.
• (Article) Sykes, H. B. (1990). Corporate venture capital: Strategies for success. Journal of Business Venturing, 5(1), 37-47.
• (Article) Sykes, H. B. (1986). The anatomy of a corporate venturing program: Factors influencing success. Journal of Business Venturing, 1(3), 275-293.
• (Article) Terwiesch, C., & Xu, Y. (2008). Innovation contests, open innovation, and multiagent problem solving. Management Science, 54(9), 1529-1543.
• (Article) Wadhwa, A., & Kotha, S. (2006). Knowledge creation through external venturing: Evidence from the telecommunications equipment manufacturing industry. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 819-835.
• (Article) Wadhwa, A., Phelps, C., & Kotha, S. (2016). Corporate venture capital portfolios and firm innovation. Journal of Business Venturing, 31(1), 95-112.
• (Article) Williams, H. (2012). Innovation inducement prizes: Connecting research to policy. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 31(3), 752-776.
• (Article) Yang, Y., Narayanan, V. K., & De Carolis, D. M. (2014). The relationship between portfolio diversification and firm value: The evidence from corporate venture capital activity. Strategic Management Journal, 35(13), 1993-2011.
• (Article) Yang, H., Zheng, Y., & Zhao, X. (2014). Exploration or exploitation? Small firms’ alliance strategies with large firms. Strategic Management Journal, 35(1), 146-157.

(c) Prof. Benoit Gailly, Louvain School of Management