Bibliography

Innovation valleys: regional innovation ecosystems

Keywords: ecosystems, knowledge spillovers, national innovation systems, Silicon Valley, triple/quadruple helix

• (Book) Athiyaman, A., Dabson, B., Hamm, G. F., Henderson, J., Holley, J., Hustedde, R., … & Low, S. A. (2007). Entrepreneurship and local economic development. Lexington Books.
• (Book) Audretsch et al. (eds.) Handbook of Research on Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
•  (Book) Fitzgerald, E. and Wankerl, A. (2017) Inside Real Innovation
• (Book) Hart, D. M. (Ed.). (2003). The emergence of entrepreneurship policy: governance, start-ups, and growth in the US knowledge economy. Cambridge University Press.
• (Book) Lundvall, B. Å. (1992) National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, London: Pinter
• (Book) Lundvall, B. Å. (Ed.). (2010). National systems of innovation: Toward a theory of innovation and interactive learning (Vol. 2). Anthem press.
• (Book) Mokyr, J. (2016) A Culture of Growth: The Origins of the Modern Economy, Princeton University Press
• (Book) Nelson, R.R. (Ed.), 1993. National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Study. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
• (Book) Saxenian, A., (1996). Regional advantage: culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
• (Video) MIT2016: Celebrating a Century In Cambridge
• (Article) Acs, Z. J., Anselin, L., & Varga, A. (2002). Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge. Research Policy, 31(7), 1069-1085.
• (Article) Adner, R. (2017). Ecosystem as structure: an actionable construct for strategy. Journal of Management, 43(1), 39-58.
• (Article) Almeida, P., & Kogut, B. (1999). Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks. Management Science, 45(7), 905-917
• (Article) Amezcua, A., Ratinho, T., Plummer, L. A., & Jayamohan, P. (2019). Organizational sponsorship and the economics of place: How regional urbanization and localization shape incubator outcomes. Journal of Business Venturing, 105967.
• (Article) Araki, M. E., Bennett, D. L., & Wagner, G. A. (2024). Regional innovation networks & high-growth entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 53(1), 104900.
• (Article) Arıkan, A. T., & Schilling, M. A. (2011). Structure and governance in industrial districts: implications for competitive advantage. Journal of Management Studies, 48(4), 772-803.
• (Article) Asheim, B. T., & Isaksen, A. (2002). Regional innovation systems: the integration of local ‘sticky’and global ‘ubiquitous’ knowledge. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 27(1), 77-86.
• (Article) Asheim, B. T., & Coenen, L. (2005). Knowledge bases and regional innovation systems: Comparing Nordic clusters. Research Policy, 34(8), 1173-1190.
• (Article) Asheim, B. T., Smith, H. L., & Oughton, C. (2011). Regional innovation systems: theory, empirics and policy. Regional Studies, 45(7), 875-891.
• (Article) Audretsch, D. B., & Feldman, M. P. (1996). R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. The American Economic Review, 86(3), 630-640.
• (Article) Audretsch, D. B., & Lehmann, E. E. (2005). Does the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship hold for regions?. Research Policy, 34(8), 1191-1202.
• (Article) Audretsch, D. B., Hülsbeck, M., & Lehmann, E. E. (2012). Regional competitiveness, university spillovers, and entrepreneurial activity. Small Business Economics, 39(3), 587-601.
• (Article) Audretsch, D. B., Cunningham, J. A., Kuratko, D. F., Lehmann, E. E., & Menter, M. (2019). Entrepreneurial ecosystems: economic, technological, and societal impacts. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 44(2), 313-325.
• (Article) Autio, E., Kenney, M., Mustar, P., Siegel, D., & Wright, M. (2014). Entrepreneurial innovation: The importance of context. Research Policy, 43(7), 1097-1108.
• (Article) Autio, E., Nambisan, S., Thomas, L. D., & Wright, M. (2018). Digital affordances, spatial affordances, and the genesis of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12(1), 72-95.
• (Article) Balland, P. A., Boschma, R., & Frenken, K. (2015). Proximity and innovation: From statics to dynamics. Regional Studies, 49(6), 907-920.
• (Article) Bird, M., & Wennberg, K. (2014). Regional influences on the prevalence of family versus non-family start-ups. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(3), 421-436.
• (Article) Bloom, N., Schankerman, M., & Van Reenen, J. (2013). Identifying technology spillovers and product market rivalry. Econometrica, 81(4), 1347-1393.
• (Article) Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61-74.
• (Article) Braunerhjelm, P., Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B., & Carlsson, B. (2010). The missing link: knowledge diffusion and entrepreneurship in endogenous growth. Small Business Economics, 34(2), 105-125.
• (Article) Breschi, S., & Lissoni, F. (2001). Knowledge spillovers and local innovation systems: a critical survey. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4), 975-1005.
• (Article) Bresnahan, T., Gambardella, A., & Saxenian, A. (2001). ‘Old economy’inputs for ‘new economy’outcomes: Cluster formation in the new Silicon Valleys. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4), 835-860.
• (Article) Bronzini, R., & Piselli, P. (2009). Determinants of long-run regional productivity with geographical spillovers: the role of R&D, human capital and public infrastructure. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 39(2), 187-199.
• (Article) Brown, R., & Mason, C. (2017). Looking inside the spiky bits: a critical review and conceptualisation of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Small Business Economics, 49(1), 11-30.
• (Article) Buesa, M., Heijs, J., & Baumert, T. (2010). The determinants of regional innovation in Europe: A combined factorial and regression knowledge production function approach. Research Policy, 39(6), 722-735.
• (Article) Carayannis, E.G., & Campbell, D.F. (2009). ‘Mode 3’and’Quadruple Helix’: toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, 46(3-4), 201-234.
• (Article) Carlsson, B., & Stankiewicz, R. (1991). On the nature, function and composition of technological systems. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 1(2), 93-118.
• (Article) Carlsson, B. (2006). Internationalization of innovation systems: A survey of the literature. Research Policy, 35(1), 56-67.
• (Article) Catalini, C. (2018). Microgeography and the direction of inventive activity. Management Science, 64(9), 4348-4364.
• (Article) Cervelló-Royo, R., Moya-Clemente, I., Perelló-Marin, M. R., & Ribes-Giner, G. (2022). A configurational approach to a country’s entrepreneurship level: Innovation, financial and development factors. Journal of Business Research, 140, 394-402.
• (Article) Cho, D. S., Ryan, P., & Buciuni, G. (2021). Evolutionary entrepreneurial ecosystems: a research pathway. Small Business Economics, 1-19.
• (Article) Clarysse, B., Wright, M., Bruneel, J., & Mahajan, A. (2014). Creating value in ecosystems: Crossing the chasm between knowledge and business ecosystems. Research Policy, 43(7), 1164-1176.
• (Article) Colatat, P. (2015).’ An organizational perspective to funding science: Collaborator novelty at DARPA’. Research Policy, 44, 874-887.
• (Article) Cooke, P., Uranga, M. G., & Etxebarria, G. (1997). Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions. Research Policy, 26(4-5), 475-491.
• (Article) Cooke, P. (2001). Regional innovation systems, clusters, and the knowledge economy. Industrial and corporate change, 10(4), 945-974.
• (Article) Cooke, P. (2010). Regional innovation systems: development opportunities from the ‘green turn’. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 22(7), 831-844.
• (Article) Crevoisier, O. (2004). The innovative milieus approach: toward a territorialized understanding of the economy?. Economic Geography, 80(4), 367-379.
• (Article) Christopherson, S., & Clark, J. (2007). Power in firm networks: What it means for regional innovation systems. Regional Studies, 41(9), 1223-1236.
• (Article) Cumming, D., Schmidt, D., & Walz, U. (2010). Legality and venture capital governance around the world. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(1), 54-72.
• (Article) Dakhli, M., & De Clercq, D. (2004). Human capital, social capital, and innovation: a multi-country study. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 16(2), 107-128.
• (Article) Denyer, D., & Neely, A. (2004).’Introduction to special issue: innovation and productivity performance in the UK’. International Journal of Management Reviews, 4/5, 131-135.
• (Article) Döring, T., & Schnellenbach, J. (2006). What do we know about geographical knowledge spillovers and regional growth?: A survey of the literature. Regional Studies, 40(03), 375-395.
• (Article) Eklinder-Frick, J., Eriksson, L. T., & Hallén, L. (2011). Bridging and bonding forms of social capital in a regional strategic network. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(6), 994-1003.
• (Article) Engel, J. S. (2015). Global clusters of innovation: Lessons from Silicon Valley. California Management Review, 57(2), 36-65.
• (Article) Engelen, A. (2010). Entrepreneurial orientation as a function of national cultural variations in two countries. Journal of International Management, 16(4), 354-368.
• (Article) Etzkowitz, H., & Klofsten, M. (2005). The innovating region: toward a theory of knowledge‐based regional development. R&D Management, 35(3), 243-255.
• (Article) Feldman, M. P., & Audretsch, D. B. (1999). Innovation in cities: Science-based diversity, specialization and localized competition. European Economic Review, 43(2), 409-429.
• (Article) Fleming, L., & Marx, M. (2006). Managing creativity in small worlds. California Management Review, 48(4), 6-27.
• (Article) Fleming, L., King III, C., & Juda, A. I. (2007). Small worlds and regional innovation. Organization Science, 18(6), 938-954.
• (Article) Freeman, C. (1995). The ‘National System of Innovation’in historical perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(1), 5-24.
• (Article) Freeman, C., & Soete, L. (2009). Developing science, technology and innovation indicators: What we can learn from the past. Research Policy, 38(4), 583-589.
• (Article) Fritsch, M., & Franke, G. (2004). Innovation, regional knowledge spillovers and R&D cooperation. Research Policy, 33(2), 245-255.
• (Article) Funk, R. J. (2014). Making the most of where you are: Geography, networks, and innovation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 57(1), 193-222.
• (Article) Furman, J. L., Porter, M. E., & Stern, S. (2002). The determinants of national innovative capacity. Research Policy, 31(6), 899-933.
• (Article) Galliano, D., Magrini, M. B., & Triboulet, P. (2015). Marshall’s versus Jacobs’ externalities in firm innovation performance: The case of French industry. Regional Studies, 49(11), 1840-1858.
• (Article) Gilbert, B. A., Audretsch, D. B., & McDougall, P. P. (2004). The emergence of entrepreneurship policy. Small Business Economics, 22(3-4), 313-323.
• (Article) Griliches, Z. (1991). The search for R&D spillovers (No. w3768). NBER.
• (Article) Guan, J., Zhang, J., & Yan, Y. (2015). ‘The impact of multilevel networks on innovation’. Research Policy, 44, 545-559.
• (Article) Guzman, J., & Stern, S. (2015). Where is silicon valley?. Science, 347(6222), 606-609.
• (Article) Hakala, H., O’Shea, G., Farny, S., & Luoto, S. Re‐storying the Business, Innovation and Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Concepts: The Model‐Narrative Review Method. International Journal of Management Reviews.
• (Article) Hansen, T. (2015). Substitution or overlap? The relations between geographical and non-spatial proximity dimensions in collaborative innovation projects. Regional Studies, 49(10), 1672-1684.
• (Article) Jacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A. (2018). Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal. 39, 2255-2276
• (Article) Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., & Henderson, R. (1993). Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. The Quarterly journal of Economics, 108(3), 577-598.
• (Article) Kafouros, M., Wang, C., Piperopoulos, P., & Zhang, M. (2015). ‘Academic collaborations and firm innovation performance in China: The role of region-specific institutions’. Research Policy, 44, 803-817.
• (Article) Karlsson, C., & Olsson, O. (1998). Product innovation in small and large enterprises. Small Business Economics, 10(1), 31-46.
• (Article) Kaufmann, A., & Todtling, F. (2000). Systems of innovation in traditional industrial regions: the case of Styria in a comparative perspective. Regional Studies, 34(1), 29-40.
• (Article) Kenney, M., & Von Burg, U. (1999). Technology, entrepreneurship and path dependence: industrial clustering in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Industrial and corporate change, 8(1), 67-103.
• (Article) Kreiser, P.M., Marino, L.D., Dickson, P., & Weaver, K.M. (2010). Cultural Influences on Entrepreneurial Orientation: The Impact of National Culture on Risk Taking and Proactiveness in SMEs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(5), 959-983.
• (Article) MacKinnon, D., Cumbers, A., & Chapman, K. (2002). Learning, innovation and regional development: a critical appraisal of recent debates. Progress in Human Geography, 26(3), 293-311.
• (Article) Miguélez, E., & Moreno, R. (2015). ‘Knowledge flows and the absorptive capacity of regions’. Research Policy, 44, 833-848.
• (Article) Molina‐Morales, F. X., & Martínez‐Fernández, M. T. (2009). Too much love in the neighborhood can hurt: How an excess of intensity and trust in relationships may produce negative effects on firms. Strategic Management Journal, 30(9), 1013-1023.
• (Article) Morgan, K. (2004). The exaggerated death of geography: learning, proximity and territorial innovation systems. Journal of Economic Geography, 4(1), 3-21.
• (Article) Nelson, R. R. (2008). What enables rapid economic progress: What are the needed institutions?. Research Policy, 37(1), 1-11.
• (Article) Nelson, R. R., & Nelson, K. (2002). Technology, institutions, and innovation systems. Research Policy, 31(2), 265-272.
• (Article) Ning, L., Wang, F., & Li, J. (2016). ‘Urban innovation, regional externalities of foreign direct investment and industrial agglomeration: Evidence from Chinese cities’. Research Policy, 45, 830-843.
• (Article) Oakey, R. (2007). Clustering and the R&D management of high‐technology small firms: in theory and practice. R&D Management, 37(3), 237-248.
• (Article) Oh, D. S., Phillips, F., Park, S., & Lee, E. (2016). Innovation ecosystems: A critical examination. Technovation, 54, 1-6.
• (Article) Owen-Smith, J., & Powell, W. (2004). ‘Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: the effects of spillovers in the Boston biotechnology community’. Organization Science, 15, 5-21.
• (Article) Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D’Este, P. & Krabel, S. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations. Research Policy, 42(2), 423-442.
• (Article) Plummer, L. A., & Acs, Z. J. (2014). Localized competition in the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(1), 121-136.
• (Article) Porter, M. E. (1990) The Competitive Advantage of Nations, Harvard Business Review 68: 73-93
• (Article) Porter, M.E. (2000). “Location, Competition and Economic development: Local Clusters in a Global economy”, Economic Development Quarterly, 14(1), 15-34.
• (Article) Ritala, P., & Almpanopoulou, A. (2017). In defense of ‘eco’in innovation ecosystem. Technovation, 60, 39-42.
• (Article) Rocha, H., & Audretsch, D. B. (2022). Entrepreneurial ecosystems, regional clusters, and industrial districts: Historical transformations or rhetorical devices?. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 1-24.
• (Article) Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Crescenzi, R. (2008). Research and development, spillovers, innovation systems, and the genesis of regional growth in Europe. Regional Studies, 42(1), 51-67.
• (Article) Roundy, P. T., Bradshaw, M., & Brockman, B. K. (2018). The emergence of entrepreneurial ecosystems: A complex adaptive systems approach. Journal of Business Research, 86, 1-10.
• (Article) Scaringella, L., & Radziwon, A. (2018). Innovation, entrepreneurial, knowledge, and business ecosystems: Old wine in new bottles?. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, 59-87.
• (Article) Simón-Moya, V., Revuelto-Taboada, L., & Guerrero, R. F. (2014). Institutional and economic drivers of entrepreneurship: An international perspective. Journal of Business Research, 67(5), 715-721.
• (Article) Singh, J. (2005). Collaborative networks as determinants of knowledge diffusion patterns. Management Science, 51(5), 756-770.
• (Article) Spigel, B. (2017). The relational organization of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(1), 49-72.
• (Article) Spigel, B. (2022). Examining the cohesiveness and nestedness entrepreneurial ecosystems: evidence from British FinTechs. Small Business Economics, 1-19.
• (Article) Storper, M., & Scott, A. J. (2009). Rethinking human capital, creativity and urban growth. Journal of Economic Geography, 9(2), 147-167.
• (Article) Tallman, S., Jenkins, M., Henry, N., & Pinch, S. (2004). Knowledge, clusters, and competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 29(2), 258-271.
• (Article) Theodoraki, C., Dana, L. P., & Caputo, A. (2021). Building sustainable entrepreneurial ecosystems: A holistic approach. Journal of Business Research.
• (Article) Torres, P., & Godinho, P. (2021). Levels of necessity of entrepreneurial ecosystems elements. Small Business Economics, 1-17.
• (Article) Tsujimoto, M., Kajikawa, Y., Tomita, J., & Matsumoto, Y. (2017). A review of the ecosystem concept—Towards coherent ecosystem design. Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
• (Article) Urbano, D., Aparicio, S., & Audretsch, D. (2019). Twenty-five years of research on institutions, entrepreneurship, and economic growth: what has been learned?. Small Business Economics, 53, 21-49.
• (Article) Uzzi, B., Amaral, L. A., & Reed‐Tsochas, F. (2007). Small‐world networks and management science research: A review. European Management Review, 4(2), 77-91.
• (Article) Van de Ven, H. (1993). The development of an infrastructure for entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 8(3), 211-230.
• (Article) Wachsen, E., & Blind, K. (2016). ‘More labour market flexibility for more innovation? Evidence from employer-employee linked micro data’. Research Policy, 45, 941-950.
• (Article) Whittington, K., Owen-Smith, J., & Powell, W. (2009). ‘Networks, Propinquity, and Innovation in Knowledge-intensive Industries’. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54, 90-122.

Muppets and unicorns: : start-up myths

Keywords: micro-firms, NTBF, start-ups

• (Book) Evans, H. (2004) “They made America: an illustrated history of two centuries of innovators”, Little Brown
• (Book) McKeown M. (2008) The truth about innovation, Pearson Prentice Hall
• (Book) Shane, S.A. (2008) The Illusions of Entrepreneurship: The Costly Myths That Entrepreneurs, Investors, and Policy Makers Live By, Yale University press
• (Video) BusinessTown 10 Myths About Entrepreneurs
• (Article) Aldrich, H. E. (1990). Using an ecological perspective to study organizational founding rates. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 14(3), 7-24.
• (Article) Birley, S., & Westhead, P. (1994). A taxonomy of business start-up reasons and their impact on firm growth and size. Journal of Business Venturing, 9(1), 7-31.
• (Article) Bjerke, L., & Johansson, S. (2015). Patterns of innovation and collaboration in small and large firms. The Annals of Regional Science, 55(1), 221-247.
• (Article) Bougrain, F., & Haudeville, B. (2002). Innovation, collaboration and SMEs internal research capacities. Research Policy, 31(5), 735-747.
• (Article) Bower, D. J. (2003). Business model fashion and the academic spinout firm. R&d Management, 33(2), 97-106.
• (Article) Brown, R., Mawson, S., & Mason, C. (2017). Myth-busting and entrepreneurship policy: the case of high growth firms. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 29(5-6), 414-443.
• (Article) Capelleras, J. L., & Greene, F. J. (2008). The determinants and growth implications of venture creation speed. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 20(4), 317-343.
• (Article) Coad, A., Segarra, A., & Teruel, M. (2016). Innovation and firm growth: does firm age play a role?. Research Policy, 45(2), 387-400.
• (Article) Colombo, M. G., & Grilli, L. (2005). Founders’ human capital and the growth of new technology-based firms: A competence-based view. Research Policy, 34(6), 795-816.
• (Article) Delmar, F., Davidsson, P., & Gartner, W. B. (2003). Arriving at the high-growth firm. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2), 189-216.
• (Article) Di Gregorio, D., & Shane, S. (2003). Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others?. Research Policy, 32(2), 209-227.
• (Article) Geroski, P. A., Mata, J., & Portugal, P. (2010). Founding conditions and the survival of new firms. Strategic Management Journal, 31(5), 510-529.
• (Article) Gimeno, J., Folta, T. B., Cooper, A. C., & Woo, C. Y. (1997). Survival of the fittest? Entrepreneurial human capital and the persistence of underperforming firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 750-783.
• (Article) Gjerløv-Juel, P., & Guenther, C. (2018). Early employment expansion and long-run survival examining employee turnover as a context factor. Journal of Business Venturing. 34(1), 80-102
• (Article) Hoffman, K., Parejo, M., Bessant, J., & Perren, L. (1998). Small firms, R&D, technology and innovation in the UK: a literature review. Technovation, 18(1), 39-55.
• (Article) Huergo, E., & Jaumandreu, J. (2004). How does probability of innovation change with firm age?. Small Business Economics, 22(3-4), 193-207.
• (Article) Kalantaridis, C. (1999). Processes of innovation among manufacturing SMEs: the experience of Bedfordshire. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 11(1), 57-78.
• (Article) Korunka, C., Frank, H., Lueger, M., & Mugler, J. (2003). The entrepreneurial personality in the context of resources, environment, and the startup process—A configurational approach. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(1), 23-42.
• (Article) Lehmann, E. E., Schenkenhofer, J., & Wirsching, K. (2019). Hidden champions and unicorns: A question of the context of human capital investment. Small Business Economics, 52, 359-374.
• (Article) Levie, J., & Lichtenstein, B. B. (2010). A terminal assessment of stages theory: Introducing a dynamic states approach to entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(2), 317-350.
• (Article) Love, J. H., & Roper, S. (2015). SME innovation, exporting and growth: A review of existing evidence. International Small Business Journal, 33(1), 28-48.
• (Article) Nightingale, P., & Coad, A. (2013). Muppets and gazelles: political and methodological biases in entrepreneurship research. Industrial and Corporate Change, 23(1), 113-143.
• (Article) O’Regan, N., Ghobadian, A., & Gallear, G. (2005). ‘In search of the drivers of high growth in manufacturing SMEs’. Technovation, 26, 30-41.
• (Article) O’Shea, R. P., Allen, T. J., Chevalier, A., & Roche, F. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of US universities. Research Policy, 34(7), 994-1009.
• (Article) Petrakis, P. E. (1997). Entrepreneurship and growth: creative and equilibrating events. Small Business Economics, 9(5), 383-402.
• (Article) Rothwell, R. (1989). Small firms, innovation and industrial change. Small Business Economics, 51-64.
• (Article) Shane, S. (2001). Technological opportunities and new firm creation. Management Science, 47(2), 205-220.
• (Article) Shane, S.A. (2009) Why encouraging more people to become entrepreneurs is bad public policy? Small Business Economics, 33, 141–149
• (Article) Siegel, R., Siegel, E., & Macmillan, I. C. (1993). Characteristics distinguishing high-growth ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 8(2), 169-180.
• (Article) Szerb, L., Lafuente, E., Horváth, K., & Páger, B. (2019). The relevance of quantity and quality entrepreneurship for regional performance: The moderating role of the entrepreneurial ecosystem. Regional Studies, 53(9), 1308-1320.
• (Article) Van Stel, A., Carree, M., & Thurik, R. (2005). The effect of entrepreneurial activity on national economic growth. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 311-321.
• (Article) Wasserman, N. (2008). The founder’s dilemma. Harvard Business Review, 86(2), 102-109.

When markets fail: targeted and effective public interventions

Keywords: externalities, invisible hand, general-purpose technologies, market failures, regulation, welfare

• (Book) Adam Smith (1776) The Wealth of Nations
• (Book) Arrow, K. J. (1972). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In Readings in industrial economics (pp. 219-236). Palgrave, London.
• (Book) Block F. et Keller M., «Where do Innovations come from?», State of Innovation: The US Government’s Role in Technology Development, Boulder, Paradigm Publishers, 2010
• (Book) Craig A. Tovey, The Usefulness of Useless Knowledge: With a companion essay by Robbert Dijkgraaf Abraham Flexner Princeton University Press, 2017. 99 pp.
• (Book) De Grauwe, P. (2016). The Limits of the Market: The Pendulum Between Government and Market. Oxford University Press.
• (Book) Mazzucato, M. (2015) The entrepreneurial state: Debunking public vs. private sector myths. Anthem Press.
• (Video) An inconvenient truth (Davis Guggenheim)
• (Article) Akerlof, G.A. (1970). The market for” lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 488-500.
• (Article) Arrow, K. J. (1972). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In Readings in industrial economics (pp. 219-236). Palgrave, London.
• (Article) Autant-Bernard, C. (2001). Science and knowledge flows: evidence from the French case. Research Policy, 30(7), 1069-1078.
• (Article) Beck, M., Lopes-Bento, C., & Schenker-Wicki, A. (2016). ‘Radical or incremental: Where does R&D policy hit?’. Research Policy, 45, 869-883.
• (Article) Capello, R., & Faggian, A. (2005). Collective learning and relational capital in local innovation processes. Regional Studies, 39(1), 75-87.
• (Article) Cohen, W.M., Nelson, R.R., & Walsh, J.P. (2002). Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science, 48(1), 1-23.
• (Article) Crescenzi, R., Gagliardi, L., & Iammarino, S. (2015). ‘Foreign multinationals and domestic innovation: Intra-industry effects and firm heterogeneity’. Research Policy, 44, 596-609.
• (Article) Furman, J. L., & Stern, S. (2011). Climbing atop the shoulders of giants: The impact of institutions on cumulative research. American Economic Review, 101(5), 1933-63.
• (Article) Gans, J. S., & Stern, S. (2010). Is there a market for ideas?. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(3), 805-837.
• (Article) Guo, D., Jiang, K., & Guo, Y. (2016). ‘Government-subsidized R&D and firm innovation: Evidence from China’. Research Policy, 45, 1129-1144.
• (Article) Jandhyala, S., & Phene, A. (2015). ‘The Role of Intergovernmental Organizations in Cross-border Knowledge Transfer and Innovation’. Administrative Science Quarterly, 60, 712-743.
• (Article) Katz, M. L., & Shapiro, C. (1986). Technology adoption in the presence of network externalities. Journal of Political Economy, 94(4), 822-841.
• (Article) Kuhlmann, S. (2001). Future governance of innovation policy in Europe—three scenarios. Research Policy, 30(6), 953-976.
• (Article) Martin, S., & Scott, J.T. (2000). The nature of innovation market failure and the design of public support for private innovation. Research Policy, 29(4), 437-447.
• (Article) Partha, D., & David, P. A. (1994). Toward a new economics of science. Research Policy, 23(5), 487-521.
• (Article) Schott, T., & Jensen, K. (2016). ‘Firms’ innovation benefiting from networking and institutional support: A global analysis of national and firm effects’. Research Policy, 45, 1233-1246.
• (Article) Takalo, T., Tanayama, T., & Toivanen, O. (2013). Market failures and the additionality effects of public support to private R&D: Theory and empirical implications. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 31(5), 634-642
• (Article) Thaler, R. (1980). Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 1(1), 39-60.
• (Article) Thaler, Richard. (1988) “The Winners Curse.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 2(1), 191-202

The visible hands: innovation support mechanisms

Keywords: accelerator, incubator, innovation policy, public procurement, science parks, subsidies

• (Book) Nooteboom, B. & Stam, E. (2010) Micro-foundations for Innovation Policy. Amsterdam university Press.
• (Book) Fischer, M. M., & Fröhlich, J. (Eds.). (2013). Knowledge, complexity and innovation systems. Springer Science & Business Media.
• (Book) Nooteboom, B. & Stam, E. (2010) Micro-foundations for Innovation Policy. Amsterdam University Press.
• (Book) Storey, D.J. , University of Warwick; OECD (2011) Business Innovation Policies: Selected Country Comparisons, OECD Publishing
• (Video) The European Business Network
• (Video) Creating an Entrepreneurial Network and Support System by Kuczmarski Innovation (on Vimeo)
• (Video) Our approach to innovation is dead wrong | Diana Kander | TEDxKC
• (Article) Aerts, K., Matthyssens, P., & Vandenbempt, K. (2007). Critical role and screening practices of European business incubators. Technovation, 27(5), 254-267.
• (Article) Aschhoff, B., & Sofka, W. (2009). Innovation on demand—Can public procurement drive market success of innovations?. Research Policy, 38(8), 1235-1247.
• (Article) Amezcua, A. S., Grimes, M. G., Bradley, S. W., & Wiklund, J. (2013). Organizational sponsorship and founding environments: a contingency view on the survival of business-incubated firms, 1994–2007. Academy of Management Journal, 56(6), 1628-1654.
• (Article) Autio, E., & Klofsten, M. (1998). A comparative study of two European business incubators. Journal of Small Business Management, 36(1), 30.
• (Article) Azoulay, P. (2012). Turn the scientific method on ourselves. Nature, 484(7392), 31-32.
• (Article) Barbero, J. L., Casillas, J. C., Wright, M., & Garcia, A. R. (2014). Do different types of incubators produce different types of innovations?. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(2), 151-168.
• (Article) Bergek, A., & Norrman, C. (2008). Incubator best practice: A framework. Technovation, 28(1-2), 20-28.
• (Article) Bloom, N., Van Reenen, J., & Williams, H. (2019). A toolkit of policies to promote innovation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33(3), 163-84.
• (Article) Bøllingtoft, A., & Ulhøi, J. P. (2005). The networked business incubator—leveraging entrepreneurial agency?. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(2), 265-290.
• (Article) Borrás, S., & Edquist, C. (2013). The choice of innovation policy instruments. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(8), 1513-1522.
• (Article) Bronzini, R., & Piselli, P. (2016). ‘The impact of R&D subsidies on firm innovation’. Research Policy, 45, 442-457.
• (Article) Bruneel, J., Ratinho, T., Clarysse, B., & Groen, A. (2012). The Evolution of Business Incubators: Comparing demand and supply of business incubation services across different incubator generations. Technovation, 32(2), 110-121
• (Article) Candeias, J., & Sarkar, S. (2022). Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and distinguishing features of effective policies–an evidence-based approach. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 1-33.
• (Article) Collewaert, V., Manigart, S., & Aernoudt, R. (2010). Assessment of government funding of business angel networks in Flanders. Regional Studies, 44(1), 119-130.
• (Article) Colombo, M. G., & Delmastro, M. (2002). How effective are technology incubators?: Evidence from Italy. Research Policy, 31(7), 1103-1122.
• (Article) Cooper, S. Y., & Park, J. S. (2008). The impact ofincubator’organizations on opportunity recognition and technology innovation in new, entrepreneurial high-technology ventures. International Small Business Journal, 26(1), 27-56.
• (Article) Costantini, V., Crespi, F., Martini, C., & Pennacchio, L. (2015). ‘Demand-pull and technology-push public support for eco-innovation: The case of the biofuels sector’. Research Policy, 44, 577-595.
• (Article) Davidsson, P., & Klofsten, M. (2003). The business platform: Developing an instrument to gauge and to assist the development of young firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 41(1), 1-26.
• (Article) Dutt, N., Hawn, O., Vidal, E., Chatterji, A., McGahan, A., & Mitchell, W. (2016). How open system intermediaries address institutional failures: The case of business incubators in emerging-market countries. Academy of Management Journal, 59(3), 818-840
• (Article) Edler, J., & Yeow, J. (2016). Connecting demand and supply: The role of intermediation in public procurement of innovation. Research Policy, 45(2), 414-426.
• (Article) Edquist, C., & Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, J. M. (2012). Public Procurement for Innovation as mission-oriented innovation policy. Research Policy, 41(10), 1757-1769.
• (Article) Flanagan, K., Uyarra, E., & Laranja, M. (2011). Reconceptualising the ‘policy mix’for innovation. Research Policy, 40(5), 702-713.
• (Article) Fleming, L., Greene, H., Li, G., Marx, M., & Yao, D. (2019). Government-funded research increasingly fuels innovation. Science, 364(6446), 1139-1141.
• (Article) Grimaldi, R., & Grandi, A. (2005). Business incubators and new venture creation: an assessment of incubating models. Technovation, 25(2), 111-121.
• (Article) Guan, J., & Yam, R. C. (2015). Effects of government financial incentives on firms’ innovation performance in China: Evidences from Beijing in the 1990s. Research Policy, 44(1), 273-282.
• (Article) Hagedoorn, J., Cloodt, D., & Van Kranenburg, H. (2005). Intellectual property rights and the governance of international R&D partnerships. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(2), 175-186
• (Article) Hansen, M. T., Chesbrough, H. W., Nohria, N., & Sull, D. N. (2000). Networked incubators. Harvard Business Review, 78(5), 74-84.
• (Article) Hekkert, M. P., Suurs, R. A., Negro, S. O., Kuhlmann, S., & Smits, R. E. (2007). Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74(4), 413-432.
• (Article) Henry, C., Hill, F. M., & Leitch, C. M. (2004). The effectiveness of training for new business creation: a longitudinal study. International Small Business Journal, 22(3), 249-271.
• (Article) Hoppe, E. I., & Schmitz, P. W. (2013). Public‐private partnerships versus traditional procurement: Innovation incentives and information gathering. The RAND Journal of Economics, 44(1), 56-74.
• (Article) Howell, S. T. (2017). Financing innovation: Evidence from R&D grants. American Economic Review, 107(4), 1136-1164.
• (Article) Hubner, S., Most, F., Wirtz, J., & Auer, C. (2021). Narratives in entrepreneurial ecosystems: drivers of effectuation versus causation. Small Business Economics, 1-32.
• (Article) Hudson, M., Smart, A., & Bourne, M. (2001). Theory and practice in SME performance measurement systems. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21(8), 1096-1115.
• (Article) Kang, K. N., & Park, H. (2012). Influence of government R&D support and inter-firm collaborations on innovation in Korean biotechnology SMEs. Technovation, 32(1), 68-78.
• (Article) Keizer, J. A., Dijkstra, L., & Halman, J. I. (2002). Explaining innovative efforts of SMEs.: An exploratory survey among SMEs in the mechanical and electrical engineering sector in The Netherlands. Technovation, 22(1), 1-13.
• (Article) Klofsten, M., Lundmark, E., Wennberg, K., & Bank, N. (2020). Incubator specialization and size: divergent paths towards operational scale. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 151, 119821.
• (Article) Koch, L. T., Kautonen, T., & Grünhagen, M. (2006). Development of cooperation in new venture support networks: the role of key actors. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 13(1), 62-72.
• (Article) Kochenkova, A., Grimaldi, R., & Munari, F. (2016). Public policy measures in support of knowledge transfer activities: a review of academic literature. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(3), 407-429.
• (Article) Lafuente, E., Ács, Z. J., & Szerb, L. (2021). A composite indicator analysis for optimizing entrepreneurial ecosystems. Research Policy, 104379.
• (Article) Lee Y.S. (2018). Government guaranteed small business loans and regional growth. Journal of Business Venturing, 33(1), 70-83.
• (Article) Lockett, A., Siegel, D., Wright, M., & Ensley, M. D. (2005). The creation of spin-off firms at public research institutions: Managerial and policy implications. Research Policy, 34(7), 981-993.
• (Article) Löfsten, H., & Lindelöf, P. (2002). Science Parks and the growth of new technology-based firms—academic-industry links, innovation and markets. Research Policy, 31(6), 859-876.
• (Article) Mason, C. M. (2009). Public policy support for the informal venture capital market in Europe: a critical review. International Small Business Journal, 27(5), 536-556.
• (Article) Mason, C., & Brown, R. (2013). Creating good public policy to support high-growth firms. Small Business Economics, 40(2), 211-225.
• (Article) Meoli, M., & Vismara, S. (2016). University support and the creation of technology and non-technology academic spin-offs. Small Business Economics, 47(2), 345-362.
• (Article) Meyer, M. (2003). Academic entrepreneurs or entrepreneurial academics? Research–based ventures and public support mechanisms. R&D Management, 33(2), 107-115.
• (Article) Mian, S. A. (1996). Assessing value-added contributions of university technology business incubators to tenant firms. Research Policy, 25(3), 325-335.
• (Article) Mian, S., Lamine, W., & Fayolle, A. (2016). Technology Business Incubation: An overview of the state of knowledge. Technovation, 50, 1-12.
• (Article) Mohnen, P., & Röller, L. H. (2005). Complementarities in innovation policy. European Economic Review, 49(6), 1431-1450.
• (Article) Mustar, P., & Larédo, P. (2002). Innovation and research policy in France (1980–2000) or the disappearance of the Colbertist state. Research Policy, 31(1), 55-72.
• (Article) Mustar, P., Renault, M., Colombo, M. G., Piva, E., Fontes, M., Lockett, A., … & Moray, N. (2006). Conceptualising the heterogeneity of research-based spin-offs: A multi-dimensional taxonomy. Research Policy, 35(2), 289-308.
• (Article) Nishimura, J., & Okamuro, H. (2011). Subsidy and networking: The effects of direct and indirect support programs of the cluster policy. Research Policy, 40(5), 714-727.
• (Article) Pahnke, E., Katila, R., & Eisenhardt, K. (2015). ‘Who Takes you to the Dance? How Parners’ Institutional Logics Influence Innovation in Young Firms’. Administrative Science Quarterly, 60, 596-633.
• (Article) Partha, D., & David, P. A. (1994). Toward a new economics of science. Research Policy, 23(5), 487-521.
• (Article) Peters, L., Rice, M., & Sundararajan, M. (2004). The role of incubators in the entrepreneurial process. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(1), 83-91.
• (Article) Phan, P. H., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. (2005). Science parks and incubators: observations, synthesis and future research. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(2), 165-182.
• (Article) Quintas, P., Wield, D., & Massey, D. (1992). Academic-industry links and innovation: questioning the science park model. Technovation, 12(3), 161-175.
• (Article) Rice, M. P. (2002). Co-production of business assistance in business incubators: an exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(2), 163-187.
• (Article) Roman, C., Congregado, E., & Millán, J.M. (2013). Start-up incentives: entrepreneurship policy or active labour market programme?. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(1), 151-175.
• (Article) Rotefoss, B., & Kolvereid, L. (2005). Aspiring, nascent and fledgling entrepreneurs: an investigation of the business start-up process. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 17(2), 109-127.
• (Article) Rotger, G.P., Gørtz, M., & Storey, D.J. (2012). Assessing the effectiveness of guided preparation for new venture creation and performance: Theory and practice. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(4), 506-521.
• (Article) Ruan, Y., Hang, C. C., & Wang, Y. M. (2014). Government׳ s role in disruptive innovation and industry emergence: The case of the electric bike in China. Technovation, 34(12), 785-796.
• (Article) Sapsed, J., Grantham, A., & DeFillippi, R. (2007). A bridge over troubled waters: Bridging organisations and entrepreneurial opportunities in emerging sectors. Research Policy, 36(9), 1314-1334.
• (Article) Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D., & Link, A. (2003). Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: an exploratory study. Research Policy, 32(1), 27-48.
• (Article) Siegel, D. S., Westhead, P., & Wright, M. (2003). Science parks and the performance of new technology-based firms: a review of recent UK evidence and an agenda for future research. Small Business Economics, 20(2), 177-184.
• (Article) Soetanto, D., & Jack, S. (2016). The impact of university-based incubation support on the innovation strategy of academic spin-offs. Technovation, 50, 25-40.
• (Article) Stam, E. (2015). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and regional policy: a sympathetic critique. European Planning Studies, 23(9), 1759-1769.
• (Article) Stenholm, P., Acs, Z.J., & Wuebker, R. (2013). Exploring country-level institutional arrangements on the rate and type of entrepreneurial activity. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(1), 176-193.
• (Article) Still, K., Huhtamäki, J., Russell, M. G., & Rubens, N. (2014). Insights for orchestrating innovation ecosystems: the case of EIT ICT Labs and data-driven network visualisations. International Journal of Technology Management 23, 66(2-3), 243-265.
• (Article) Storey, D. J., & Tether, B. S. (1998). Public policy measures to support new technology-based firms in the European Union. Research Policy, 26(9), 1037-1057.
• (Article) Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2005). One size fits all?: Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research Policy, 34(8), 1203-1219.
• (Article) Vanderstraeten, J., & Matthyssens, P. (2012). Service-based differentiation strategies for business incubators: Exploring external and internal alignment. Technovation, 32(12), 656-670.
• (Article) Van Looy, B. V., Debackere, K., & Andries, P. (2003). Policies to stimulate regional innovation capabilities via university–industry collaboration: an analysis and an assessment. R&D Management, 33(2), 209-229.
• (Article) Van Rijnsoever, F. J., Van Den Berg, J., Koch, J., & Hekkert, M. P. (2015). Smart innovation policy: How network position and project composition affect the diversity of an emerging technology. Research Policy, 44(5), 1094-1107.
• (Article) van Rijnsoever, F. J. (2022). Intermediaries for the greater good: How entrepreneurial support organizations can embed constrained sustainable development startups in entrepreneurial ecosystems. Research Policy, 51(2), 104438.
• (Article) Vargo, S. L., Wieland, H., & Akaka, M. A. (2015). Innovation through institutionalization: A service ecosystems perspective. Industrial Marketing Management, 44, 63-72.
• (Article) Vasquez-Urriago, A., Barge-Gil, A., & Rico, A. (2016). ‘Science and Technology Parks and cooperation for innovation: Empirical evidence from Spain’. Research Policy, 45, 137-147.
• (Article) Vogelaar, J. J., & Stam, E. (2021). Beyond market failure: rationales for regional governmental venture capital. Venture Capital, 1-34.
• (Article) Wang, Y., Li, J., & Furman, J. L. (2017). Firm performance and state innovation funding: Evidence from China’s Innofund program. Research Policy, 46(6), 1142-1161.
• (Article) Watkins, A., Papaioannou, T., Mugwagwa, J., & Kale, D. (2015). ‘National innovation systems and the intermediary role of industry associations in building institutional capacities for innovation in developing countries: A critical review of the literature’. Research Policy, 44, 1407-1418.
• (Article) Weinberg, B. A., Owen-Smith, J., Rosen, R. F., Schwarz, L., Allen, B. M., Weiss, R. E., & Lane, J. (2014). Science funding and short-term economic activity. Science, 344(6179), 41-43.
• (Article) Woolthuis, R. K., Lankhuizen, M., & Gilsing, V. (2005). A system failure framework for innovation policy design. Technovation, 25(6), 609-619.

(c) Prof. Benoit Gailly, Louvain School of Management