Bibliography

Resistance to change: disrupting routines

Keywords: human fear, inertia, job destruction, organizational routines, , path dependency, precautionary principle, resistance to change, responsible innovation, routines, technology assessment

• (Book) Callon, M. (2009). Acting in an uncertain world. MIT press.
• (Book) Godin, S. (2003). Purple cow: Transform your business by being remarkable. Penguin.
• (Book) Harremoës, P., Gee, D., MacGarvin, M., Stirling, A., Keys, J., Wynne, B., & Vaz, S. G. (2013). The precautionary principle in the 20th century: Late lessons from early warnings. Routledge.
• (Book) Juma, C. (2016). Innovation and its enemies: Why people resist new technologies. Oxford University Press.
• (Book) Kotter, J. P., & Rathgeber, H. (2006). Our iceberg is melting: Changing and succeeding under any conditions. Macmillan.
• (Book) Lewin, K. (2013). A Dynamic Theory of personality-Selected papers. Read Books Ltd.
• (Book) Perez, C. (2003). Technological revolutions and financial capital. Edward Elgar Publishing.
• (Book) Senge, P. M. (2014). The dance of change: The challenges to sustaining momentum in a learning organization. Crown Business
• (Video) Dean Kamen: To invent is to give (TED talk)
• (Video) Back to the Future
• (Video) How to Deal with Resistance to Change | Heather Stagl | TEDxGeorgiaStateU.
• (Article) Alexy, O., Henkel, J., & Wallin, M. W. (2013). From closed to open: Job role changes, individual predispositions, and the adoption of commercial open source software development. Research Policy, 42(8), 1325-1340.
• (Article) Bacq, S., & Aguilera, R. V. (2021). Stakeholder Governance for Responsible Innovation: A Theory of Value Creation, Appropriation, and Distribution. Journal of Management Studies, Forthcoming.
• (Article) Becker, M.C. (2004). Organizational routines: a review of the literature. Industrial and Corporate Change, 13(4), 643-678.
• (Article) Cohen, M. D., Burkhart, R., Dosi, G., Egidi, M., Marengo, L., Warglien, M., & Winter, S. (1996). Routines and other recurring action patterns of organizations: contemporary research issues. Industrial and Corporate Change, 5(3), 653-698.
• (Article) Dobusch, L., & Schüßler, E. (2012). Theorizing path dependence: a review of positive feedback mechanisms in technology markets, regional clusters, and organizations. Industrial and Corporate Change, 22(3), 617-647.
• (Article) Eggers, J. P., & Kaplan, S. (2013). Cognition and capabilities: A multi-level perspective. Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 295-340.
• (Article) Feldman, M.S. (2000). Organizational Routines as a Source of Continuous Change. Organization Science, 11(6): 611-629
• (Article) Felin, T., & Foss, N. J. (2009). Organizational routines and capabilities: Historical drift and a course-correction toward microfoundations. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 25(2), 157-167.
• (Article) Ford, J. D., Ford, L. W., & D’Amelio, A. (2008). Resistance to change: The rest of the story. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 362-377.
• (Article) Ford, J. D., & Ford, L. W. (2009). Decoding resistance to change. Harvard Business Review, 87(4), 99-103.
• (Article) Fosfuri, A., & Rønde, T. (2009). Leveraging resistance to change and the skunk works model of innovation. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 72(1), 274-289.
• (Article) Frambach, R. T., & Schillewaert, N. (2002). Organizational innovation adoption: A multi-level framework of determinants and opportunities for future research. Journal of Business Research, 55(2), 163-176.
• (Article) Geels, F. W., & Schot, J. (2007). Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy, 36(3), 399-417.
• (Article) Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, Reprint 95204
• (Article) Kotter, J. P. (2012). Accelerate! Harvard Business Review, 90(11), 45-56
• (Article) Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1984). Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 149-164.
• (Article) Heidenreich, S., & Spieth, P. (2013). Why innovations fail—The case of passive and active innovation resistance. International Journal of Innovation Management, 17(05), 1350021.
• (Article) Hellström, T. (2003). Systemic innovation and risk: technology assessment and the challenge of responsible innovation. Technology in Society, 25(3), 369-384.
• (Article) Huy, Q. N. (2002). Emotional balancing of organizational continuity and radical change: The contribution of middle managers. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(1), 31-69.
• (Article) Kleijnen, M., Lee, N., & Wetzels, M. (2009). An exploration of consumer resistance to innovation and its antecedents. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30(3), 344-357.
• (Article) Lapointe, L., & Rivard, S. (2007). A triple take on information system implementation. Organization Science, 18(1), 89-107.
• (Article) Le Bas, C., Mothe, C., & Nguyen-Thi, T. U. (2015). The differentiated impacts of organizational innovation practices on technological innovation persistence. European Journal of Innovation Management, 18(1), 110-127.
• (Article) Liebowitz, S. J., & Margolis, S. E. (1995). Path dependence, lock-in, and history. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 205-226.
• (Article) Logue, D., & Grimes, M. (2022). Living up to the hype: How new ventures manage the resource and liability of future-oriented visions within the nascent market of impact investing. Academy of Management Journal, 65(3), 1055-1082.
• (Article) Mani, Z., & Chouk, I. (2018). Consumer resistance to innovation in services: challenges and barriers in the internet of things era. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 35(5), 780-807.
• (Article) Marcati, A., Guido, G., & Peluso, A. M. (2008). The role of SME entrepreneurs’ innovativeness and personality in the adoption of innovations. Research Policy, 37(9), 1579-1590.
• (Article) Marquis, C. (2003). The pressure of the past: Network imprinting in intercorporate communities. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(4), 655-689.
• (Article) Pardo del Val, M., & Martínez Fuentes, C. (2003). Resistance to change: a literature review and empirical study. Management Decision, 41(2), 148-155.
• (Article) Pentland, B. T., & Feldman, M. S. (2005). Organizational routines as a unit of analysis. Industrial and Corporate Change, 14(5), 793-815.
• (Article) Schot, J., & Rip, A. (1997). The past and future of constructive technology assessment. Technological forecasting and social change, 54(2-3), 251-268.
• (Article) Sydow, J., Schreyögg, G., & Koch, J. (2009). Organizational path dependence: Opening the black box. Academy of Management Review, 34(4), 689-709.
• (Article) Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 27-43.
• (Article) Van de Ven, A. H., & Poole, M. S. (1995). Explaining development and change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 510-540.
• (Article) Van de Ven, A. H., & Poole, M. S. (2005). Alternative approaches for studying organizational change. Organization Studies, 26(9), 1377-1404.
• (Article) Vergne, J. P., & Durand, R. (2010). The missing link between the theory and empirics of path dependence: conceptual clarification, testability issue, and methodological implications. Journal of Management Studies, 47(4), 736-759.
• (Article) Vuori, T., & Huy, Q. (2016). ‘Distributed Attention and Shared Emotions in the Innovation Process: How Nokia Lost the Smartphone Battle’. Administrative Science Quarterly, 61, 1-43.
• (Article) Walsh, J.P., & Ungson, G.R. (1991). Organizational memory. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 57-91

Drivers of adoption: make it worth it

Keywords: adoption, bandwagon, diffusion, emergence, marketing of innovation, perceived benefits, social contagion, technology foresight

• (Book) Bijker, W. E., Hughes, T. P., & Pinch, T. J. (2012). The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology.
• (Book) Cialdini, R.B. (2007) Influence: the Psychology of Persuasion
• (Book) Gladwell, M. (2006). The tipping point: How little things can make a big difference. Little, Brown.
• (Video) iDiots
• (Article) Abrahamson, E., & Rosenkopf, L. (1993). Institutional and competitive bandwagons: Using mathematical modeling as a tool to explore innovation diffusion. Academy of Management Review, 18(3), 487-517.
• (Article) Agarwal, R., & Bayus, B. L. (2002). The market evolution and sales takeoff of product innovations. Management Science, 48(8), 1024-1041.
• (Article) Aghion, P., Dechezleprêtre, A., Hemous, D., Martin, R., & Van Reenen, J. (2016). Carbon taxes, path dependency, and directed technical change: Evidence from the auto industry. Journal of Political Economy, 124(1), 1-51.
• (Article) Antonides, G., Bas Amesz, H., & Hulscher, I. C. (1999). Adoption of payment systems in ten countries-a case study of diffusion of innovations. European Journal of Marketing, 33(11/12), 1123-1135.
• (Article) Arts, J. W., Frambach, R. T., & Bijmolt, T. H. (2011). Generalizations on consumer innovation adoption: A meta-analysis on drivers of intention and behavior. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 28(2), 134-144.
• (Article) Bakker, S. (2010) The car industry and the blow-out of the hydrogen hype. Energy Policy, vol. 38, no. 11, pp. 6540-6544.
• (Article) Choi, J. N., Sung, S. Y., Lee, K., & Cho, D. S. (2011). Balancing cognition and emotion: Innovation implementation as a function of cognitive appraisal and emotional reactions toward innovation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(1), 107-124.
• (Article) Cialdini, R.B., & Goldstein, N.J. (2004) Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 55, 591-621.
• (Article) Eerkens, Jelmer W., and Carl P. Lipo. “A tale of two technologies: Prehistoric diffusion of pottery innovations among hunter-gatherers.” Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 35 (2014): 23-31.
• (Article) Geroski, P. A. (2000). Models of technology diffusion. Research Policy, 29(4-5), 603-625.
• (Article) Gollier, C. (2001). “Should we beware of the precautionary principle?” Economic Policy, 33, 303-327.
• (Article) Iyengar, R., Van den Bulte, C., & Valente, T. W. (2011). Opinion leadership and social contagion in new product diffusion. Marketing science, 30(2), 195-212.
• (Article) Jeyaraj, A., Rottman, J. W., & Lacity, M. C. (2006). A review of the predictors, linkages, and biases in IT innovation adoption research. Journal of Information Technology, 21(1), 1-23.
• (Article) Nelson, R. R., Peterhansl, A., & Sampat, B. (2004). Why and how innovations get adopted: a tale of four models. Industrial and Corporate Change, 13(5), 679-699.
• (Article) Saloner, G., & Shepard, A. (1992). Adoption of technologies with network effects: an empirical examination of the adoption of automated teller machines (No. w4048). NBER
• (Article) Seligman, L. (2006). Sensemaking throughout adoption and the innovation-decision process. European Journal of Innovation Management, 9(1), 108-120.
• (Article) Stock, R., von Hippel, E., & Gillert, N. (2016). ‘Impacts of personality traits on consumer innovation success’. Research Policy, 45, 757-769.
• (Article) Tornatzky, L. G., & Klein, K. J. (1982). Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: A meta-analysis of findings. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, (1), 28-45.
• (Article) Van den Bulte, C., & Joshi, Y. V. (2007). New product diffusion with influentials and imitators. Marketing science, 26(3), 400-421.
• (Article) Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204.
• (Article) Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS quarterly, 425-478
• (Article) Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS quarterly, 36(1), 157-178.

Drivers of adoption: make it easy

Keywords: adoption hurdles, adoption engineering, compatibility, complexity, cultural ambience, influencer, observability, product lifecycle, public sector innovation, skeuomorphism, standardization, switching costs, triability

• (Book) Abrahamson, E. (2004). Change without pain: How managers can overcome initiative overload, organizational chaos, and employee burnout. Harvard Business Press.
• (Book) Eagleman, D., & Brandt, A. (2017). The Runaway Species: How human creativity remakes the world. Catapult.
• (Book) Fagerberg, J. (2005) The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, Oxford University Press.
• (Book) Norman, D. A. (2013). The design of everyday things: Revised and expanded edition. Basic books.
• (Book) Rogers, E. M. (2010). Diffusion of innovations. Simon and Schuster.
• (Book) Thaler, R. and Sunstein, R. (2012) Nudge
• (Book) Dawkins, R. (2016). The selfish gene. Oxford university press.
• (Video) The Zinnovants, “Convince”
• (Video) The diffusion of innovation theory (Aiman Pht)
• (Article) Adner, R. (2006). Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem. Harvard Business Review, 84(4), 98.
• (Article) Adner, R., & Kapoor, R. (2016). Right Tech, Wrong Time. Harvard Business Review, 94(11), 60-67.
• (Article) Albury, D. (2005). Fostering innovation in public services. Public Money and Management, 25(1), 51-56.
• (Article) Allen, R. H., & Sriram, R. D. (2000). The role of standards in innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 64(2-3), 171-181.
• (Article) Bass, F.M. (2004). Comments on “a new product growth for model consumer durables the bass model”. Management Science, 50(12_supplement), 1833-1840.
• (Article) Bessant, J. (2005). Enabling continuous and discontinuous innovation: Learning from the private sector. Public Money and Management, 25(1), 35-42.
• (Article) Chakravorti, B. (2004). The new rules for bringing innovations to market. Harvard Business Review, 82(3), 58-67.
• (Article) Choi, J. N., & Chang, J. Y. (2009). Innovation implementation in the public sector: An integration of institutional and collective dynamics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), 245.
• (Article) Chiesa, V., & Frattini, F. (2011). Commercializing technological innovation: Learning from failures in high‐tech markets. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(4), 437-454.
• (Article) Coeurderoy, R., Guilmot, N., & Vas, A. (2014). Explaining factors affecting technological change adoption: A survival analysis of an information system implementation. Management Decision, 52(6), 1082-1100.
• (Article) Damanpour, F., & Schneider, M. (2008). Characteristics of innovation and innovation adoption in public organizations: Assessing the role of managers. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(3), 495-522.
• (Article) De Vries, H., Bekkers, V., & Tummers, L. (2016). Innovation in the public sector: A systematic review and future research agenda. Public Administration, 94(1), 146-166.
• (Article) Frambach, R. T., Barkema, H. G., Nooteboom, B., & Wedel, M. (1998). Adoption of a service innovation in the business market: an empirical test of supply-side variables. Journal of Business Research, 41(2), 161-174.
• (Article) Goldenberg, J., Han, S., Lehmann, D. R., & Hong, J. W. (2009). The role of hubs in the adoption process. Journal of Marketing, 73(2), 1-13.
• (Article) Greenhalgh, T., Robert, G., Macfarlane, F., Bate, P., & Kyriakidou, O. (2004). ‘Diffusion of Innovations in Service Organizations: Systematic Review and Recommendations’. The Milbank Quarterly, 82, 581-629.
• (Article) Greenwood, R., Suddaby, R., & Hinings, C. R. (2002). Theorizing change: The role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 58-80.
• (Article) Griliches, Z. (1957). Hybrid corn: An exploration in the economics of technological change. Econometrica, Journal of the Econometric Society, 501-522.
• (Article) Hameed, M. A., & Counsell, S. (2014). Establishing relationships between innovation characteristics and IT innovation adoption in organisations: A meta-analysis approach. International Journal of Innovation Management, 18(01), 1450007.
• (Article) Hard M. & Knie A. (2001) The cultural dimension of technology management: Lessons from the history of the Automobile. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management Vol. 13(1);
• (Article) Hartley, J. (2005). Innovation in governance and public services: Past and present. Public Money and Management, 25(1), 27-34.
• (Article) Leonard-Barton, D., & Sinha, D. K. (2017). Developer-user interaction and user satisfaction in internal technology transfer. Academy of Management Journal.
• (Article) Lounsbury, M. (2007). A tale of two cities: Competing logics and practice variation in the professionalizing of mutual funds. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 289-307.
• (Article) Mahajan, V., Muller, E., & Bass, F. M. (1990). New product diffusion models in marketing: A review and directions for research. Journal of Marketing, 54(1), 1-26.
• (Article) Micheli, P., Schoeman, M., Baxter, D., & Goffin, K. (2012). New business models for public-sector innovation: Successful technological innovation for government. Research-Technology Management, 55(5), 51-57.
• (Article) Mustonen‐Ollila, E., & Lyytinen, K. (2003). Why organizations adopt information system process innovations: a longitudinal study using Diffusion of Innovation theory. Information Systems Journal, 13(3), 275-297.
• (Article) Reinders, M. J., Frambach, R. T., & Schoormans, J. P. (2010). Using product bundling to facilitate the adoption process of radical innovations. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(7), 1127-1140.
• (Article) Tucker, C. (2008). Identifying formal and informal influence in technology adoption with network externalities. Management Science, 54(12), 2024-2038.
• (Article) van Oorschot, J. A., Hofman, E., & Halman, J. I. (2018). A bibliometric review of the innovation adoption literature. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 134, 1-21.
• (Article) Wisdom, J. P., Chor, K. H. B., Hoagwood, K. E., & Horwitz, S. M. (2014). Innovation adoption: a review of theories and constructs. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 41(4), 480-502.

(c) Prof. Benoit Gailly, Louvain School of Management